Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3400G - 122 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $132.0 vs $550.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900X - $1.12 vs $4.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.51/FPS
24.833702882483376%
Price, $
$550
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $550 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
118
96.72131147540983%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$132
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
75.80645161290323%
Multi-Core
3619
38.0306851618327%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |