Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 0% better in Valheim than Core i5-10400F - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $112.53 vs $550.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-9900X - $0.56 vs $2.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
20.58823529411765%
Price, $
$550
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $550 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
99.5049504950495%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
96.63978494623656%
Multi-Core
5751
60.435056746532155%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |