Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 183 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 2600 - 240 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $155.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-9920X - $0.67 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
27.016129032258068%
Price, $
$595
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349600 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
231
96.25%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349600 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
81.52866242038218%
Multi-Core
4841
51.27091717856387%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |