Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 553 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i9-9920X - 62 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $150.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9920X - $2.42 vs $10.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
58
93.54838709677419%
Value, $/FPS
$10.26/FPS
23.586744639376217%
Price, $
$595
25%
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349596 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |