Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 871 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6900K - 132 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $145.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-9920X - $1.12 vs $4.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 140 vs 165 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.51/FPS
24.833702882483376%
Price, $
$595
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349756 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
129
97.72727272727273%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
88.60580325548479%
Multi-Core
7118
75.38657064181318%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |