Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 407 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $61.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-6100 - $0.26 vs $0.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Pentium G3250 - 260 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 51 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
239
91.92307692307692%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359779 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
260
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
68.42105263157895%
Price, $
$100
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359780 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
48.24120603015075%
Multi-Core
981
41.99486301369863%
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |