Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 4173 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 167 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |