Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 25% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 404 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 28 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 20 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
