Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3129 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |