Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3411 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 189 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
