Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 4376 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 75% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $59.96 vs $243.49
- Up to 62% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Radeon Pro W6400 - $1.39 vs $3.69 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 53% better in Borderlands 3 than GeForce GT 220 - 66 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 50 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
43
65.15151515151516%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312970 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.69/FPS
37.669376693766935%
Price, $
$243.49
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312968 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
6.435178978415336%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
12.868632707774799%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |