Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 211 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $63.83 vs $372.84
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-9900 - $0.4 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 19% better in Dirt 5 than Athlon 3000G - 191 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
161
84.29319371727748%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
20.512820512820515%
Price, $
$372.84
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $372.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
59.40409683426443%
Multi-Core
1975
27.415324819544693%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |