Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 877 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $63.83 vs $375.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-7820X - $1.68 vs $7.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 37% better in Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 3000G - 52 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
38
73.07692307692307%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349046 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.21/FPS
23.300970873786405%
Price, $
$375
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
67.82423812898654%
Multi-Core
1975
25.162441075296215%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |