Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 211 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $63.83 vs $389.88
- Up to 80% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-9700F - $0.41 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 21% better in War Thunder than Athlon 3000G - 188 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
155
82.4468085106383%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
19.806763285024154%
Price, $
$389.88
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
61.781794706262104%
Multi-Core
1975
31.56969309462916%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |