Buy on Amazon
$82
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2700K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2700K is 1898 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $82.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 18% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3930 - $0.42 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280398 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
