Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2448 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-6300 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than FX-6300 - $110.99 vs $128.04
- Up to 15% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-6300 - $0.58 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
189
99.47368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
85.29411764705881%
Price, $
$128.04
86%
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353966 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |