Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3381 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-6300 - 124 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than FX-6300 - $94.98 vs $128.04
- Up to 34% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-6300 - $0.77 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
109
87.90322580645162%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
65.81196581196582%
Price, $
$128.04
74%
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348517 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |