Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2373 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6300 - 106 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than FX-6300 - $115.0 vs $128.04
- Up to 24% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6300 - $1.08 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
90
84.90566037735849%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
76.05633802816902%
Price, $
$128.04
89%
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354104 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |