Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1773 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6300 - 344 vs 319 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-6300 - $109.99 vs $128.04
- Up to 20% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-6300 - $0.32 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280522 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
344
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |