Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 799 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-6350 - $49.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-6350 - $0.21 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361157 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
95.49180327868852%
Multi-Core
954
61.311053984575835%
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |