Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 238 days older than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than FX-6350 - 612 vs 603 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than FX-6350 - $41.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-6350 - $0.07 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
603
98.52941176470588%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
41.1764705882353%
Price, $
$100
41%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361331 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
612
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361330 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |