Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2405S outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2405S is 708 days older than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than FX-6350 - 237 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than FX-6350 - $46.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-6350 - $0.19 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
235
99.15611814345992%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
44.18604651162791%
Price, $
$100
46%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361329 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | No |