Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $46.0 vs $80.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - $1.02 vs $1.51 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 18% better in Starfield than Core i5-2405S - 53 vs 45 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
45
84.90566037735849%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349804 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
67.54966887417218%
Price, $
$80
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
50.85551330798479%
Multi-Core
1429
47.427812811151675%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |