Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $100.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-11900 - $0.76 vs $1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 71% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 226 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
132
58.4070796460177%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349097 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
63.8655462184874%
Price, $
$270
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |