Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 603 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than Pentium G630 - 99 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-6350 - $37.49 vs $100.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than FX-6350 - $0.39 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
38.613861386138616%
Price, $
$100
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361469 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
97
97.97979797979798%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |