Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 708 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G840.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G840 - 240 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Up to 55% cheaper than FX-6350 - $45.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6350 - $0.19 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
45.23809523809524%
Price, $
$100
45%
FPS Winner
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361319 minutes ago
Pentium G840
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
233
97.08333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G840 Dual Core 2.8 GHz Intel HD Graphics Retail 2.8 2 LGA 1155 Processor - BX80623G840
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Pentium G840
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G840
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
439
89.95901639344262%
Multi-Core
745
47.87917737789203%
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Pentium G840 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
