Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 855 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-6350 - 208 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than FX-6350 - $39.95 vs $100.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than FX-6350 - $0.19 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
205
98.5576923076923%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
38.775510204081634%
Price, $
$100
39%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361343 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |