Buy on Amazon
$64.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $64.03 vs $143.72
- Up to 46% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-10600K - $0.32 vs $0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 20% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8150 - 244 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
203
83.19672131147541%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361282 minutes ago
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
54.23728813559322%
Price, $
$143.72
44%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
