Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - $64.03 vs $69.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-7500T - $0.29 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8150 - 231 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
222
96.1038961038961%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354097 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
96.66666666666667%
Price, $
$69
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |