Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570 is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-4570 - $64.03 vs $70.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-4570 - $0.4 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than FX-8150 - 170 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
162
95.29411764705881%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354127 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
97.56097560975611%
Price, $
$70
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |