Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 276 days older than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $64.03 vs $70.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-2600K - $0.41 vs $0.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8150 - 160 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
93.18181818181817%
Price, $
$70
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |