Buy on Amazon
$64.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $212
Availability
MSRP in USD: $212
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - $64.03 vs $120.23
- Up to 44% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-3570K - $0.1 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than FX-8150 - 683 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
672
98.38945827232797%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361024 minutes ago
Core i5-3570K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
683
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
55.55555555555556%
Price, $
$120.23
53%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-3570K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570K
Buy for $120.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361023 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-3570K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
