Buy on Amazon
$64.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 447 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $64.03 vs $70.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3210 - $0.2 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8150 - 319 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280566 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280566 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
