Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $64.03 vs $140.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-8400 - $0.55 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8150 - 131 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
117
89.31297709923665%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361273 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
51.40186915887851%
Price, $
$140
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |