Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 2564 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-9500 - $64.03 vs $160.74
- Up to 55% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-9500 - $0.27 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 268 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
86.94029850746269%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361277 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
268
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
45.00000000000001%
Price, $
$160.74
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |