Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $64.03 vs $205.5
- Up to 62% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-10700KF - $0.32 vs $0.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8150 - 245 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
203
82.85714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361527 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
38.0952380952381%
Price, $
$205.5
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361527 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |