Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700 is 3758 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $64.03 vs $265.49
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 427% better in League of Legends than FX-8150 - 290 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-8150 - $0.92 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
55
18.96551724137931%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
79.31034482758622%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361757 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
290
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$265.49
24%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $265.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |