Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770S outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770S is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-4770S - $64.03 vs $119.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-4770S - $0.27 vs $0.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 258 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
90.31007751937985%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361062 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
58.69565217391305%
Price, $
$119
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770S |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |