Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $64.03 vs $99.9
- Up to 31% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-6700T - $0.2 vs $0.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8150 - 341 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
318
93.25513196480938%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359809 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
341
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
68.96551724137932%
Price, $
$99.9
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359810 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |