Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $64.03 vs $252.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-7700K - $0.45 vs $1.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8150 - 165 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
143
86.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361664 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
29.411764705882355%
Price, $
$252
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $252 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361665 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |