Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - $47.98 vs $69.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-7500T - $0.31 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8300 - 169 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
92.89940828402366%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359800 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
75.60975609756098%
Price, $
$69
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |