Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than FX-8320 - 257 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than FX-8320 - $69.0 vs $102.02
- Up to 39% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8320 - $0.27 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
234
91.05058365758755%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
61.36363636363637%
Price, $
$102.02
67%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360824 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360825 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |