Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $102.02 vs $247.71
- Up to 56% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-10700K - $0.8 vs $1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320 - 138 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
92.02898550724638%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349100 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
44.44444444444445%
Price, $
$247.71
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |