Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $102.02 vs $202.98
- Up to 29% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i7-11700F - $0.84 vs $1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 40% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-8320 - 170 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
121
71.17647058823529%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
70.58823529411765%
Price, $
$202.98
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $202.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |