Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $102.02 vs $253.44
- Up to 21% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-12700K - $0.78 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 96% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 255 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
50.98039215686274%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
78.7878787878788%
Price, $
$253.44
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $253.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |