Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $102.02 vs $252.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-7700K - $0.78 vs $1.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 46% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 190 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
68.42105263157895%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
58.64661654135338%
Price, $
$252
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $252 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |