Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $102.02 vs $260.26
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-9700 - $0.92 vs $2.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320 - 123 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
90.2439024390244%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349091 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
43.39622641509434%
Price, $
$260.26
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349092 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |