Key Differences
In short — Core i7-990X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-990X is 607 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-990X - $102.02 vs $178.02
- Up to 42% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-990X - $0.49 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-990X - 125 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-990X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than FX-8320 - 212 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
98.11320754716981%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349584 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, $
$178.02
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-990X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 24th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Gulftown |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |