Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2834 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $102.02 vs $286.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10850K - $0.78 vs $1.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 54% better in War Thunder than FX-8320 - 200 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349093 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
54.545454545454554%
Price, $
$286
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |