Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 422 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Ryzen 3 1200 - 199 vs 195 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $145.0 vs $395.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.73 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
195
97.98994974874373%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
35.960591133004925%
Price, $
$395
36%
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
78.59424920127796%
Multi-Core
2834
39.814554650182636%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |